Asrock H61M-VG3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG3  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 16:42
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 74
2-Core 166
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 327
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 84F2) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 512G 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 145 122 138 143 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61% Good
Read 192
Write 232
Mixed 116
SusWrite 127
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 37.8
116% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 118
111% 174 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 61%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
564GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 159 153 157 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 145
Write 140
Mixed 46
SusWrite 152
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 109%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00KUWA0 1TB
423GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25.7
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 25.5
36% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-165.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 20% 5 18 6 60 22" 1680 1050 DELF041 DELL P2213
Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,082 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback