Foxconn H61MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardFoxconn H61MX  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 09:39
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 87
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 333
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1642 3C79) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 10.7
6% 9.47 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 6.4
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
105GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 90.5
Write 92
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 68.3
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST3160316CS 160GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 33 45 44 49 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 46.5
Write 46.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 40.2
30% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CF8 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MX Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback