Dell System XPS L702X

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Dell System XPS L702X (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 03RG89
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120907
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '21 at 19:35
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 141 60% 100 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 369 37% 302 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M 4,170 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 0570) 3GB CLim: 590 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 389.34 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	4.51% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 8.1 Parallax 4.9 4% 6.07 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 5.5 5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.51% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 642GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 422 425 410 413 416 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 458 Write 416 Mixed 392 SusWrite 414 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 30.1 95% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 254 194% 269 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 637GB free Firmware: AX001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 85 84 84 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 81.7 Write 79.5 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 83.3 50% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 16JTF51264HZ-1G4M1 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.7% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	100	17.3"	1101 598	LGD02C5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical System XPS L702X Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Dell System XPS L702X

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	239x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	164x
Core i7-2720QMIntel $85Bench 58%, 7,798 samples	47x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	242x
GeForce GT 555MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,170 samples	236x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $43Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	12x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	11x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	67x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	38x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16