Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP270E5E-X01TR
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '21 at 17:21
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 55 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 111 46% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 134 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C709) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.86% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.57 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.86% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ezcool S280 240GB 722 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: EZ2019 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 407 Write 310 Mixed 324 77% 347 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 8.2 51% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 82.2 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 19.3 50% 101 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 13 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 7.8 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
3%	2%	41	35	28	60	15.5"	1366 768	CMO1592

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 3: 0R 1G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	78x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	190x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	40x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	23x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369