MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 17:10
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 298
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 964
93% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,085
67% 1,085 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 150
Parallax 150
125% 151 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 115
Splatting 0.1
70% 98.9 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$77
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 178 175 178 186 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 478
Write 175
Mixed 261
SusWrite 178
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 34.4
110% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 225
192% 283 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 100%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
120GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 98 176 104 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,443
Write 1,540
Mixed 1,062
SusWrite 225
239% 1,067 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 80.6
278% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 272
345% 603 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 192%
Great: 255%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
406GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 122 122 123 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 121
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
773GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 209 212 212 211 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 168
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 210
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 119%
Great: 114%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 142 140 142 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 131
Mixed 70
SusWrite 140
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
284GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 109 108 107 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 63
SusWrite 106
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 25.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 4R 6G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 34% 41 112 9 144 27" 2560 1440 ACR052F XB271HU A
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $859
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback