Intel powered classmate PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel powered classmate PC  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140530
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 15:42
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2806
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 49.7
1-Core 14.2
2-Core 22.9
22% 28.9 Pts
4-Core 30.6
8-Core 27.7
4% 29.2 Pts
64-Core 30.9
2% 30.9 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 99A5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3366
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.1
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 68 53 66 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 76.9
Write 61.8
Mixed 41.9
SusWrite 66.3
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown N3S04F1333E-L RE00 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
12% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical powered classmate PC Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel powered classmate PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback