Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics176% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 13:56
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,112
100% 844 Pts
64-Core 1,911
118% 1,911 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12AE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4045 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 217
Parallax 260
194% 239 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 239
Splatting 185
194% 246 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 176%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB
894GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 426 237 101 159 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 490
Write 229
Mixed 194
SusWrite 290
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 2.8
52% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 52.5
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 15.3
22% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 216%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1830 1035 869 609 824 609 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,592
Write 2,448
Mixed 1,712
SusWrite 963
380% 1,679 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 69
234% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,283
DQ Write 959
DQ Mixed 1,150
852% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 245%
Great: 298%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
30GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 101 99 92 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 346
Write 129
Mixed 186
SusWrite 97.1
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 31.1
138% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 94.5
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 97.8
77% 106 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
908GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 110 113 110 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 97.1
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 110
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
561GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 87 89 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 133
Write 127
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 86.8
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 53.6
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 40.5
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 22.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 121%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 43.4" 1280 720 SNYF903
Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback