Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '21 at 14:18
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 110
2-Core 266
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 1,047
89% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,797
111% 1,797 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12AE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4045 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Lighting 234
Reflection 214
Parallax 273
191% 241 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 237
Splatting 165
186% 238 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 172%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB
790GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 514 420 234 221 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 1,090
Write 194
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 362
91% 422 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 10.8
50% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 1.4
44% 116 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 216%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1430 974 969 905 882 769 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,345
Write 2,041
Mixed 1,483
SusWrite 988
331% 1,464 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 61.5
218% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,194
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 1,111
818% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 229%
Great: 298%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
30GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 96 90 97 99 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 268
Write 121
Mixed 166
SusWrite 93.3
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 36.2
135% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 86
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 103
79% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
908GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 89 89 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 92.5
Mixed 57
SusWrite 88.1
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
561GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 94 94 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 141
Write 88
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 92.9
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 52.9
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 40.4
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.9
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 119%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 43.4" 1280 720 SNYF903
Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback