Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive6.56% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-R  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 13 '21 at 07:53
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 189
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 372
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 52 107 77 64 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Read 32.3
Write 299
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 75.6
24% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.4
2% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
743GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 110
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R744G2133U1S 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 6.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback