HP 240 G3 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP 240 G3 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 220F
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190613
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '21 at 04:59
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	27.3% Poor	Memory 46.6 1-Core 24.4 2-Core 48.9 27% 40 Pts	4-Core 48.9 8-Core 47.7 6% 48.3 Pts	64-Core 49 3% 49 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.76% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.77 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.76% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 115 190 196 212 192 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.6% Above average	Read 250 Write 223 Mixed 216 SusWrite 187 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 26 87% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 136 102% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 6 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	4	60	14"	1366 768	CMN1499

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 240 G3 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G3 Notebook PC

CPU
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	59x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	33x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	19x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	62x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	48x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	19x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	9x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	19x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	17x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16