Fujitsu D3118-A1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu D3118-A1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 22:30
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 152
56% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 570
54% 447 Pts
64-Core 804
50% 804 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 90.5
55% 73.5 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 46.2
48% 60.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07373
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 258 188 127 106 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 451
Write 437
Mixed 400
SusWrite 204
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 35.8
126% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 249
189% 251 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170DZ1- 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D3118-A1 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Fujitsu D3118-A1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback