Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 22:14
Run Duration416 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 160
2-Core 319
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 960
99% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,155
72% 1,155 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 123
Parallax 166
91% 133 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 112
Splatting 81.5
79% 98.1 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2217 637 609 614 614 614 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,560
Write 2,367
Mixed 1,641
SusWrite 884
416% 1,863 MB/s
4K Read 69.1
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 92.3
314% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,301
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 1,094
818% 1,098 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 303%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
282GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 463 464 461 442 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 453
Mixed 450
SusWrite 430
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 57.6
190% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 219
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
201GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 464 465 463 464 463 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 454
Mixed 328
SusWrite 463
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 36.1
149% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 103
91% 140 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Adata S599 40GB
12GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 7
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 6.9
2% 7.97 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
1% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
508GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 195 196 196 193 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 141
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 194
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 34.7
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 37.3
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC20B PHL 245E1
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback