Lenovo 20QNS00X00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20QNS00X00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20QNS00X00
Memory17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210622
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 00:23
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 243
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 748
71% 589 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro T2000
Legend(17AA 2297) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.9% Average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 54.3
52% 60.5 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 55.6
Splatting 58.6
43% 51.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SABRENT 1TB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.2
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,066
Write 2263
Mixed 1,241
1,137% 1,523 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 66.8
11,904% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,118
DQ Write 869
DQ Mixed 996
9,125% 994 MB/s
SABRENT 1TB
825GB free
Firmware: RKT303.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2053 832 799 838 831 835 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 859B CT16G4SFD8266.M16FJ 32GB
3200, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 26.8
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 26.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN4183
Typical 20QNS00X00 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 20QNS00X00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback