Asus Z97-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-P  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 19:02
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 234
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 452
56% 429 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 66.8
56% 69.2 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 65.3
56% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 500GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,568
Write 1,644
Mixed 1269
334% 1,494 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 72.3
255% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,253
DQ Write 1052
DQ Mixed 988
785% 1,097 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 237%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
20GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 482
Mixed 347
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 36.4
174% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 331
257% 352 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
519GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 140 143 136 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 143
Write 144
Mixed 106
SusWrite 139
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 2R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 15% 89 193 8 144 24" 1920 1080 ACI24AE MG248
Typical Z97-P Builds (Compare 2,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-P - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback