Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V GENE (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '21 at 20:44
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 94.4 1-Core 118 2-Core 213 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 445 60% 448 Pts	64-Core 457 28% 457 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1356 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.7.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Lighting 65.9 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 88.8 54% 72.4 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 46.8 48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 376 404 410 427 398 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 484 Mixed 399 SusWrite 405 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 57.8 193% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 366 276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 196GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 104 103 104 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 124 Write 115 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 103 69% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 91GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 109 Write 87.8 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 100 66% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 0GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 28.6 Write 37.3 Mixed 22 22% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 91GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 93 94 93 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 150 Write 115 Mixed 92.5 SusWrite 93 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 86GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 104 102 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 111 Write 106 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 103 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 109%
XinTop XT-U3Y3502 500GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 375GB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 73 73 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 71.8 Write 71.2 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 73 86% 64 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 40,596 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 23.2 72% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 20.8 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	331x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	189x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	23x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16