Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110610
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 12:59
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 162
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 257
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 90.3
55% 74.3 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 48.7
50% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 89 99 92 98 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 177
Write 121
Mixed 143
SusWrite 95.6
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 25.8
86% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 93.7
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 103
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
367GB free
Firmware: HP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 108
Write 122
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 114
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 70%
XinTop XT-U3Y3502 500GB
436GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 53
Write 24.5
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 25.5
38% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
50% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG SLA302G08-GGNHC NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $572
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback