Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1515M v5 12 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 206 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 557 56% 455 Pts	64-Core 560 35% 560 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKF512G8 512GB 212 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 462GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004P SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 371 351 135 303 558 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	258% Outstanding	Read 2,256 Write 1,490 Mixed 1,318 SusWrite 381 302% 1,361 MB/s	4K Read 67.4 4K Write 163 4K Mixed 96.2 312% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,124 DQ Write 1,006 DQ Mixed 1,091 811% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 258% Great: 277%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 6,353 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 386GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 105 56 86 103 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 90.9 Write 120 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 91.8 132% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 57%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 3.7 4.2 4.2 4.7 5.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	2.9% Terrible	Read 11 Write 0.3 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 3.7 4% 4.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.9% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB 38,499 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 41.9 MC Mixed 12.6 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 11.3 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	6	64	0"	1280 1024

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16