Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 14:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 177
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 459
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 10.18.10.3304
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 4.3
10% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1225A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 201 121 72 116 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 258
Write 226
Mixed 227
SusWrite 143
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 21.8
110% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 39.6
66% 127 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
388GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 60 63 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 56
Mixed 49
SusWrite 63.4
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5469-078.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 7.8
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback