Asus CG8565

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CG8565  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8565
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111013
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 157
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 463
44% 366 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 94.7
Parallax 96.7
87% 99.3 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 92.5
Splatting 84.3
79% 98.1 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCM-256M3S 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: WRS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 207 212 172 205 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.1% Above average
Read 230
Write 214
Mixed 178
SusWrite 199
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 23
79% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 133
114% 167 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
142GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 61 91 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 71.7
Write 70.5
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 85.4
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata EL63I1C1624ZV 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback