Asus CG8565

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus CG8565 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8565
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111013
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '21 at 16:39
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 177 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 373 46% 351 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2167) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.9% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 101 Parallax 107 92% 107 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 95.7 Splatting 89 83% 103 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCM-256M3S 256GB 782 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: WRS1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 218 180 215 227 223 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58% Above average	Read 222 Write 207 Mixed 182 SusWrite 212 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 24.9 90% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 135 115% 168 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 155GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 87 88 88 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 123 Write 116 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 86.9 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata EL63I1C1624ZV 4x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.8% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 14.8 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 45: 5R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
45%	56%	27	105	5	144	27"	1280 720	HPN3580 HP 27x

History: Score 14: 2R 0G 4B | Score 45: 5R 5G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	34x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	3x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	4x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $175Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
SLA302G08-MGJHB 2x4GBUnknownBench 55%, 53 samples	6x
SLA302G08-MGJHB 4x4GBUnknownBench 55%, 61 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $530

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16