Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive19.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 16:07
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 216
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 771
68% 576 Pts
64-Core 1,240
77% 1,240 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 113
Parallax 103
91% 109 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 105
Splatting 99.8
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
R580 240GB 240GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 83 22 136 26 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 313
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 79.8
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 14.2
34% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 38.5
DQ Mixed 44.4
31% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7BFR8A-PB 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 58.8
MC Write 49.3
MC Mixed 49.3
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 11% 19 349 286 60 24" 1920 1080 ACR03E3 K242HL
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 34: 4R 4G 2B | Score 13: 0R 4G 1B | Score 11: 2R 0G 1B | Score 2: 0R 0G 2B
Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback