Supermicro X8DT3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardSupermicro X8DT3  (all builds)
Memory15 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20100813
Uptime21.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 20:59
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5687
CPU 2, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 196
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 653
62% 514 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
MSI(1462 2773) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 54.8
34% 44.2 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 25.3
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 210 205 206 207 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66% Good
Read 214
Write 206
Mixed 196
SusWrite 206
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 40.7
135% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 39.7
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 51.1
42% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 66%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
213GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 120 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 175
Write 169
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 121
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC72B4PB0NL-CG 6x4GB
6 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 17.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8DT3 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Supermicro X8DT3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback