Supermicro X8DT3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardSupermicro X8DT3  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20100813
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 06:24
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5687
CPU 2, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 91
2-Core 190
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 619
60% 491 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
MSI(1462 2773) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 36.6
Parallax 59.7
34% 45.8 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 44
Splatting 25.3
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 210 212 208 208 208 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.4% Good
Read 216
Write 205
Mixed 188
SusWrite 209
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 40
132% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 39.1
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 50.3
41% 56.7 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
296GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 189 191 192 194 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 172
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 192
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC72B4PB0NL-CG 6x4GB
6 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 17.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8DT3 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Supermicro X8DT3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback