Supermicro AS -4124GS-TNR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro AS -4124GS-TNR  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H12DSG-O-CPU
Memory248.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 08:40
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7402 24-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 62.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 238
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 948
84% 712 Pts
64-Core 3,533
219% 3,533 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 119
Parallax 125
109% 126 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 105
Splatting 91
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago SMC3108 12TB
11TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 174 167 179 158 172 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7DJR8N-XN 16x16GB
16 of 32 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
257% Outstanding
MC Read 110
MC Write 87.6
MC Mixed 126
308% 108 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 34.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 257%
Great: 257%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 19" 1280 720 HWP2842 HP LE1901w
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback