Dell Vostro 460

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Dell Vostro 460 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0Y2MRG
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111017
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '17 at 11:01
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 190 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 468 48% 390 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200 6,989 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B A004) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTGAN102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10144 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 669 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 169 169 18824916031242 (AE) Unknown 200 200 2362232 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 39 (C2) HDA temperature 67 41 253403136033 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 782357 (F2) Unknown 100 100 607211 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	88.1% Excellent	Read 512 Write 474 Mixed 307 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 33 94% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 91 95% 159 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 102%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 232GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 148 144 3566 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 86 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 109 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 76 (C2) HDA temperature 114 103 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	61.4% Good	Read 108 Write 106 Mixed 104 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.4 98% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 121GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 141 3908 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 95 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 113 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 16 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 83 (C2) HDA temperature 105 100 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	69.4% Good	Read 124 Write 118 Mixed 117 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.48 114% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 70%
WDC WD25 00AAKX-75U6AA0 250GB 38GB free, PID 0218 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.4% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 24.1 Mixed 26.6 34% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.21 58% 0.72 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GB 1,553 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Vostro 460 Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 460

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	208x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	181x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	85x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	107x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	37x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
MX500 1TBCrucial $80Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x

RAM
99U5584-007.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 46%, 119 samples	6x
NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 44%, 1,579 samples	6x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16