MSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7756
MotherboardMSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120528
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateAug 03 '17 at 09:38
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 332
40% 308 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2302 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.4% Good
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 86
Parallax 75.8
72% 83.2 fps
MRender 82.1
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 78.9
65% 79.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
930GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 106
Write 122
Mixed 118
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.29
112% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
767GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 81.7
Mixed 83.4
65% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.25
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
518GB free
Firmware: CC38
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 95.1
Write 95
Mixed 60.6
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.46
111% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
340GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 111
Write 109
Mixed 109
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
334GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 53.3
Mixed 48
40% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.45
108% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP64 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 92.4
Mixed 68
61% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.37
84% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B1GDE.9K10C 8502 PSD34G13332 017A 78.B1GDE.9K10C 8502 PSD34G13332 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77MA-G43 (MS-7756) Builds (Compare 498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback