Lenovo 2988D9U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2988D9U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateAug 05 '21 at 00:54
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 370
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 32.5
19% 27.7 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 26.2
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
100GB free
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 167 197 200 222 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.7% Average
Read 249
Write 214
Mixed 198
SusWrite 202
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 19.2
70% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 73.2
DQ Mixed 107
85% 122 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 73%
Samsung 960 EVO 500G 500GB
234GB free
Firmware: CXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 265 329 335 370 375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 202
Write 323
Mixed 214
SusWrite 336
61% 269 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 24.2
80% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 124
90% 117 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 73%
Asustor iSCSI Storage 103TB
95.5TB free
Firmware: 221
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 62 94 87 33 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.4% Poor
Read 88.9
Write 41.8
Mixed 98
SusWrite 57.8
16% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 10.7
37% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 122
88% 113 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 23%
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
746GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU2OA720
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 100 103 102 118 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 122
Write 132
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 109
70% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 85%
Apple iPod 4GB
3GB free, PID 1262
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 12.4
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 10.5
14% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 0443 RMR5030EF68F9W1600 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 26" 1280 720 VIZ0000 D43fx-F4
Typical 2988D9U Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2988D9U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $258
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback