bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel D5400XS
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 20:56
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core2 Extreme X9775
J6PR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 88.6
43% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 280
28% 230 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 202 199 196 191 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.1% Good
Read 178
Write 171
Mixed 184
SusWrite 196
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 33.8
111% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 184
138% 184 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 133%
Freenas iSCSI Disk 215GB
192GB free
Firmware: 0123
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 41 42 43 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 28%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
1GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.9
Write 46.8
Mixed 36.6
34% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
308GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 81 80 81 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 54.6
Write 53.4
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 80.1
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.1% Poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 9.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 64 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback