Monster HUMA H4 V4.1

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Monster HUMA H4 V4.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER HUMA H4 V4.1
Memory	60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '21 at 19:32
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1165G7 51,565 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 160 2-Core 272 91% 168 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 744 75% 609 Pts	64-Core 726 45% 726 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(1D05 1105) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Lighting 21.1 Reflection 26.7 Parallax 24.1 17% 24 fps	MRender 22.5 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 19.4 21% 26.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB 3,483 User benchmarks, average bench 391% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: GXB7301Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2091 2083 2023 1871 1865 1867 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	351% Outstanding	Read 1,682 Write 1,902 Mixed 1,826 SusWrite 1,967 417% 1,844 MB/s	4K Read 72.6 4K Write 177 4K Mixed 102 335% 117 MB/s	DQ Read 1,448 DQ Write 1,219 DQ Mixed 1,306 986% 1,325 MB/s
Poor: 225% ↑ This bench: 351% Great: 508%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB 22,361 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 1.5TB free Firmware: 42AZS6AC SusWrite @10s intervals: 918 939 936 953 955 957 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 813 Write 906 Mixed 143 SusWrite 943 158% 701 MB/s	4K Read 60.5 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 84.6 288% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,274 DQ Write 843 DQ Mixed 674 607% 930 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 370%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GB 2,607 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 30.4 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 42.2 SC Mixed 19.1 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	14"	1280 720	BOE0961

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HUMA H4 V4.1 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Monster HUMA H4 V4.1

CPU
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples	43x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	43x

SSD
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples	14x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples	9x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	7x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	9x
CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FR 2x8GBCrucialBench 85%, 536 samples	7x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16