Unknow Unknow

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemUnknow Unknow  (all builds)
Motherboard RS780-SB700
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081231
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 16:52
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 94
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 76.4
46% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 74.7
8-Core 75.6
10% 75.1 Pts
64-Core 64.3
4% 64.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 5/i 7TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 246 254 222 235 252 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
Read 561
Write 510
Mixed 530
SusWrite 245
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 35.1
126% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 66.7
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 100
68% 83 MB/s
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 249GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 35 34 34 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 36
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 35.6
26% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Unknow Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Unknow Unknow

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback