PC CosmosVII 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPC CosmosVII 15  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO N8xEJEK
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime18.2 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 14:21
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 212
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 736
78% 622 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 852B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6230
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 30.7
25% 33.3 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 12.5
20% 26.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 331 329 329 331 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 586
Write 875
Mixed 491
SusWrite 353
130% 576 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 59.3
182% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 816
607% 807 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 138%
Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
904GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 123 131 135 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 109
Write 89.6
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 124
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.7
346% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CM4X8GF2400C16S4 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 23.8
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 2R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 11% 61 268 153 60 15.5" 1536 864 LGD0590
Typical CosmosVII 15 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: PC CosmosVII 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback