Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive377% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 14:14
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 77.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 296
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,157
104% 876 Pts
64-Core 2,788
173% 2,788 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 405C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 201
Parallax 197
173% 204 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 152
Splatting 136
129% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 147%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2434 2484 2495 2195 1725 1354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2,595
Write 2,515
Mixed 1,615
SusWrite 2,114
496% 2,210 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 82.6
289% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,352
DQ Write 1,119
DQ Mixed 1230
923% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 377%
Great: 425%
SSD 480GB
267GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 236 96 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 449
Write 313
Mixed 323
SusWrite 170
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 34.2
130% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 152
120% 166 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 98%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
101GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 433 432 432 433 374 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 410
Mixed 416
SusWrite 423
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 47.7
159% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 185
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
835GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 179 185 189 186 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 126
Write 166
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 182
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
50% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 158 158 164 164 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 138
Write 147
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 159
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.9
334% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46.3
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 41.2
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 35.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 114%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 8% 59 342 278 60 48.9" 3840 1080 ACR06D5 EI491CR
History: Score 25: 3R 3G 1B | Score 11: 0R 3G 2B
Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback