Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 113
58% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 329
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 186
Parallax 176
138% 177 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 179
Splatting 122
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 94 96 96 98 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 444
Write 160
Mixed 215
SusWrite 100
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.9
18% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 130%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
41GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 63 63 59 51 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 462
Write 62.9
Mixed 109
SusWrite 60
37% 174 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 4.7
42% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 34%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB
241GB free
Firmware: RAGNWA07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 151 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 108
Write 190
Mixed 102
SusWrite 151
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
347% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-17000CL9-4GBXM F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-17000CL9-4GBXM F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 19
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 70: 8R 8G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
70% 42% 52 280 205 75 23.8" 2048 1152 PHLC20B PHL 245E1
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback