Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
99% 186 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 880
93% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 257
Reflection 254
Parallax 517
210% 343 fps
MRender 387
Gravity 200
Splatting 288
237% 292 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 195%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 489 489 490 490 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 489
Mixed 446
SusWrite 488
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 60.7
214% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 231
178% 244 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
351GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 462 462 463 424 298 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 444
Mixed 413
SusWrite 428
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 33.2
121% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 193
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
323GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 336 306 307 307 307 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 488
Write 450
Mixed 417
SusWrite 327
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 33.2
126% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 208
148% 188 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
478GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 464 464 465 465 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 446
Mixed 417
SusWrite 464
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 49.1
168% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 160
119% 159 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 27.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 165 27" 1280 720 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback