Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 10:25
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 320
99% 187 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 899
94% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
172% Outstanding
Lighting 261
Reflection 246
Parallax 558
213% 355 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 195
Splatting 282
145% 159 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 172%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 489 460 480 484 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 489
Mixed 446
SusWrite 481
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 68
228% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 311
210% 252 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
351GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 464 446 459 445 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 454
Mixed 448
SusWrite 428
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 57.7
193% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 193
145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
323GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 464 446 460 444 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 455
Mixed 455
SusWrite 426
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 58.1
194% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 194
146% 196 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
478GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 465 446 460 465 463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 453
Mixed 408
SusWrite 460
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.6
169% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 193
138% 175 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 27
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 28.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 165 27" 1280 720 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback