Gigabyte Z170X-GAMING 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte Z170X-GAMING 3  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 04:51
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 208
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 318
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 6.1
5% 7.6 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 10
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKKA51 512GB
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 007D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 518 526 522 526 531 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 2,085
Write 1,272
Mixed 200
SusWrite 583
227% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 58.8
198% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 1,153
DQ Write 507
DQ Mixed 194
312% 618 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 217%
Great: 285%
Intel SSDSC2BB480G6 480GB
237GB free
Firmware: G2010130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 403 398 389 400 401 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 317
Write 387
Mixed 264
SusWrite 399
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 37.2
144% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 247
188% 253 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 98%
Jmicron Tech 120GB
54GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.5% Very poor
Read 40.4
Write 40.2
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 41.7
9% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 11.8
40% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 15
12% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.4 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.6
11% 10 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14/16G 04CB DDR4 3000 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ78C3 BenQ GW2750H
Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 2,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z170X-GAMING 3 - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback