QBEX QBEX-H61H2-M17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemQBEX QBEX-H61H2-M17  (all builds)
MotherboardQBEX QBEX-H61H2-M17
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '21 at 00:55
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 148
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 345
39% 305 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 68.6
55% 70.5 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 67.6
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 16 83 101 14 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.7% Poor
Read 141
Write 81.5
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 55
19% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 9
37% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 9.2
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 11.3
9% 12 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
97GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 50 49 48 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 6.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 48.8
13% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
54% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16%
Great: 42%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
150GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 80 78 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 77.4
Write 73.4
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 79.8
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 79%
USB 3.0 super high speed 256GB
67GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 27 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 32.5
Write 28
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 27.6
40% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 6.4
440% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown.C146G.C3V0C 079E TMT41GU6BFR8C-PBHJ 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 6R 6G 16B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 72% 39 247 157 60 21.5" 1920 1080 GSM5819 E2241
History: Score 54: 5R 7G 8B | Score 70: 9R 5G 10B | Score 64: 6R 6G 16B
Typical QBEX-H61H2-M17 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: QBEX QBEX-H61H2-M17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback