Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA560
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210104
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '21 at 22:47
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Memory 93.2 1-Core 144 2-Core 283 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 814 81% 659 Pts	64-Core 951 59% 951 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2012) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.17% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 160 Parallax 8.3 5% 58.3 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 11.3 8% 9.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.17% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB 4,252 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 404GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1747 1066 803 764 814 818 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 1,884 Write 1,910 Mixed 1,423 SusWrite 1002 349% 1,555 MB/s	4K Read 56.3 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 73.6 240% 81 MB/s	DQ Read 1,242 DQ Write 1,003 DQ Mixed 1,132 845% 1,126 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 297%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 8,520 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 33 13 14 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 144 Write 36.6 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 24.5 72% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2.2 136% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 34.2 MC Mixed 24 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 38.3 SC Mixed 26.8 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	144	15.5"	1280 720	NCP004B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	732x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	271x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	245x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	207x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	271x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	183x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $81Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	409x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	160x
TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GBUnknownBench 76%, 2,477 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16