Samsung Q470C/500P4C

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Samsung Q470C/500P4C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP500P4C-AD3BR
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131101
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '21 at 21:20
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 153 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 325 38% 294 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C650) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 2 Parallax 2.8 3% 2.9 fps	MRender 4.8 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.8 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 220 231 217 223 224 MB/s Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.7% Above average	Read 232 Write 193 Mixed 200 SusWrite 220 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 24.8 91% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 160 131% 187 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-055.A00LF 0194 SH564128FH8NZQNSCR 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.5% Average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 15 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 23: 3R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
23%	17%	41	34	28	60	14"	1366 768	SEC3649

History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 9: 1R 1G 1B | Score 15: 2R 1G 2B | Score 23: 3R 2G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q470C/500P4C Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung Q470C/500P4C

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	35x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	14x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	54x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	5x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Force LE200 SSD 240GBCorsairBench 68%, 4,783 samples	2x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	3x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,461 samples	3x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16