Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355V5C-S03TR
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime28.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 16:30
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 74%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-4400M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Memory 1.82
1-Core 14.1
2-Core 22.8
6% 12.9 Pts
4-Core 29
8-Core 29.2
4% 29.1 Pts
64-Core 24.1
2% 24.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 3.7 6.4 4.3 5.8 102 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.1% Very poor
Read 167
Write 112
Mixed 97
SusWrite 23.9
22% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 7.2
22% 7.7 MB/s
DQ Read 89.2
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 59.5
53% 79 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 78%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
351GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.7 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 31.9
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 5.9
28% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata MIF4D2C087KZ1 MIF4D2C087KZ1 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.46% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 487
8% 487 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 1 0 64 0" 1366 768
Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback