Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355V5C-S03TR
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 10:10
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 74%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-4400M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Memory 37.9
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 53.3
24% 37.7 Pts
4-Core 51.9
8-Core 50.6
7% 51.2 Pts
64-Core 52.4
3% 52.4 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.9 1.8 2.5 131 168 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.1% Poor
Read 212
Write 168
Mixed 145
SusWrite 51.3
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 7.8
28% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 93.5
DQ Mixed 67.7
62% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata MIF4D2C087KZ1 MIF4D2C087KZ1 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.5
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 0 64 0" 1366 768
Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback