Gigabyte Z370 HD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 HD3P
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 HD3P  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 15:11
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 158
2-Core 317
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1026
102% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,262
78% 1,262 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Zotac(19DA 4617) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 123
Parallax 131
113% 131 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 109
Splatting 93.2
92% 115 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 273 275 275 275 275 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 422
Mixed 414
SusWrite 288
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 69.5
229% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 252
209% 300 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 124%
Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
374GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2198 665 620 617 622 621 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2276
Write 2,214
Mixed 1,399
SusWrite 890
379% 1,695 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 92.8
310% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,388
DQ Write 1,046
DQ Mixed 1,181
893% 1,205 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 296%
Great: 340%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.7 3.5 3.1 3.9 3.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Read 16.6
Write 10.2
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 3.2
12% 9.72 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3845 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 29.5
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 51.9
SC Mixed 33.1
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 IVM760D PL3272UH
Typical GA-Z370 HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 HD3P - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback