Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 03:32
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 464
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 36.6
29% 37.1 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 27.1
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 384 401 408 428 438 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 449
Mixed 437
SusWrite 402
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 57.9
196% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
134GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 164 164 165 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 143
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 163
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
137GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 169 169 166 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 140
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 168
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
83GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 157 165 164 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 139
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 164
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
117GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 152 154 155 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 140
Write 135
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 153
80% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 25.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 30 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $634
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback