Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.3
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210326
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 00:03
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 142 2-Core 264 93% 166 Pts	4-Core 516 8-Core 755 79% 635 Pts	64-Core 944 58% 944 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Device(1D05 1116) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.4% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 151 Parallax 100 88% 120 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 102 Splatting 87.1 87% 110 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B07 512GB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 306% 289GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXA7302Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1976 2179 2194 1074 759 757 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	311% Outstanding	Read 2433 Write 2,278 Mixed 2,198 SusWrite 1,490 472% 2,100 MB/s	4K Read 62.5 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 80.6 264% 89 MB/s	DQ Read 991 DQ Write 832 DQ Mixed 915 684% 913 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 311% Great: 423%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 64GB-$47 392 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 10GB free, PID 1a09 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 89 97 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 118 Write 94.6 Mixed 87.4 SusWrite 95 131% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 47% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB 15,521 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.9% Excellent	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 26.4 91% 32 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 37.2 SC Mixed 27.9 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 4R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	16%	85	266	161	144	17.3"	1920 1080	BOE0823

History: Score 33: 5R 2G 2B | Score 36: 4R 3G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.3 Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	387x
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	209x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	356x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	240x

SSD
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	135x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	102x
SSDPEKNW010T9 1TBIntelBench 216%, 20,963 samples	98x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	141x
CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 1,244 samples	118x
CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 65%, 1,143 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16