Gigabyte GA-H270N-WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H270N-WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270N-WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170209
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 14:08
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 259
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 754
72% 594 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 0.3
6% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 106 77 5.5 63 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 432
Write 363
Mixed 11
SusWrite 75.3
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
668GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 90 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 114
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 92.2
59% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 151 151 151 150 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 147
Write 145
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 150
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: CV22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 162 164 165 167 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 164
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-026.A00G 9905701-143.A00G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 54.6" 1280 720 TCL5507 TCL SMART TV
Typical GA-H270N-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270N-WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback