Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 30 '21 at 04:57
Run Duration520 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 85.9
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 99.9
52% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 259
27% 218 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
PNY(196E 0F01) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asrock RAM Disk 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,432
Write 2,191
Mixed 2,278
514% 2,301 MB/s
4K Read 235
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 216
738% 217 MB/s
DQ Read 523
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 483
363% 485 MB/s
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 22 50 59 49 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 58.1
Write 68.4
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 46
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 107 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 75.7
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 104
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 30 54 60 52 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 110
Write 83.8
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 49.4
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 67%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 139 137 138 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.2% Above average
Read 134
Write 132
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 138
170% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-111.A00LF 9905403-111.A00LF 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 1R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 8% 126 53 40 60 27" 1536 864 DEL41E7 DELL S2721HGF
History: Score 5: 0R 1G 2B | Score 22: 2R 2G 6B | Score 9: 1R 1G 1B | Score 20: 4R 0G 0B | Score 13: 0R 4G 1B | Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 18: 1R 2G 7B
Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback