ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G752VSK

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus G752VSK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G752VSK
Memory	45.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170427
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '17 at 00:05
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 106 2-Core 211 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 432 58% 432 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Asus(1043 17D0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Lighting 99.6 Reflection 108 Parallax 95.2 81% 101 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 95.7 Splatting 99.8 80% 96.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	287% Outstanding	Read 2,716 Write 1,464 Mixed 1,699 432% 1,960 MB/s	4K Read 52.2 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 64.4 231% 82.6 MB/s	DQ Read 428 DQ Write 379 DQ Mixed 199 205% 335 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 287% Great: 292%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 119GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4771 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3936 (B1) Unknown 96 96 64 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 44 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3061 (F1) Unknown 99 99 68348889250	104% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 401 Mixed 413 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 43.8 149% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 131 143% 243 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC M471A1G43DB0-CPB M471A2K43BB1-CRC M471A1K43BB0-CPB 48GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 25.1 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 22.4 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G752VSK Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 50%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

System: Asus G752VSK

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	222x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	309x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	117x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	60x
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples	26x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 13,778 samples	42x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	37x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GBSamsungBench 76%, 4,237 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback