Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 14:25
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 235
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 732
70% 578 Pts
64-Core 1,259
78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 85.9
54% 75.8 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 45
45% 56.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 700
Write 643
Mixed 236
116% 527 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 51.8
166% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 641
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 310
297% 471 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 223%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
60GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 894 303 304 303 301 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,298
Write 993
Mixed 688
SusWrite 401
188% 845 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 42.7
168% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 709
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 704
516% 675 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 157%
Great: 223%
ST1000LM035-1RK1 1TB
194GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 33.6
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 33.5
43% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 24.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 24.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback