Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Predator PH315-52 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Covini_CFS
Memory	5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	13.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '21 at 04:53
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 131 2-Core 256 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 775 76% 623 Pts	64-Core 907 56% 907 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Acer(1025 1343) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6627 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.8% Above average	Lighting 61.9 Reflection 94.9 Parallax 80.8 50% 79.2 fps	MRender 95.6 Gravity 78.8 Splatting 72.7 66% 82.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB 4,910 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 661 Write 251 Mixed 297 88% 403 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 24.4 97% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 407 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 295 231% 322 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 130%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 38GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,626 Write 2,180 Mixed 1,326 383% 1,711 MB/s	4K Read 50 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 57.2 198% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 822 DQ Write 657 DQ Mixed 747 557% 742 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GB 17,072 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	77% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 21.9 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 23.5 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 30: 1R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
30%	52%	27	270	186	144	15.5"	1536 864	AUO82ED

History: Score 17: 3R 0G 2B | Score 24: 2R 2G 8B | Score 30: 1R 6G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	3,353x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	558x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,802x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	1,501x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	607x

SSD
KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GBNvmeBench 103%, 4,910 samples	359x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 159%, 3,211 samples	339x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 3,501 samples	303x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 17,072 samples	1,239x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	795x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	208x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16