HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81FC
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '21 at 09:59
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9410 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.9% Poor
Memory 35
1-Core 23.8
2-Core 33.3
21% 30.7 Pts
4-Core 64.6
8-Core 62.1
9% 63.3 Pts
64-Core 66.2
4% 66.2 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 81FC) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 5.1
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 231 238 251 217 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 164
Write 195
Mixed 173
SusWrite 225
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 9
34% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 118
94% 133 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA425S6AFR6N-TF HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 6GB
2133, 2133 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 3.9
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.6
6% 2.07 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback